MACCALLUM SUITES DECISION
RECINDED
Web Posted February 3, 2009
by Richard Johnson
On February 3, Mendocino County supervisors voted 4-1 with
supervisor
Pinches dissenting to rescind the decision of December 15 to remove 4
visitor
serving facility designations from the Mendocino Art Center and grant
them
to the MacCallum Suites, the former Reed Manor overlooking the town of
Menocino
from the north, just west of Highway One. The instruction to county
counsel
included rescheduling the hearing with proper notice.
The move required the board to modify their rules
concerning
recissions to eliminate a provision that a supervisor who approved a
measure
had to vote affirmatively rescind it. That requirement remains for
reconsideration.
County counsel Jeanine Nadel put the item on the
agenda,
stating that the previous decision was an error she had warned against
in
that the public and the Art Center were not notified in advance that
the
designations were to be switched. That action came as an alternative
motion
to a routine item about a proposed Mendocino Town Plan amendment. Nadel
said the
board had ignored her advice to wait until completion of review of the
that Plan which includes tables allocating business, residential and
visitor
serving units to individual parcels. She said that adequate notice was
fundamental
to our system of government, state law and the Coastal Act.
Jared Carter, attorney for Mac House innkeepers
threatened
the board with a federal civil rights lawsuit if the took that action,
stating
that removing a private propery interest from his clients would be a
"big
deal' in which a "lot of money would be involved." He said his clients
were
relying on the December 15 decision and renting the units and would
continue
to do so no matter what the board decided that day.
Nadel read the ordinance back to Carter, in the
detail
that final approval of the resolution depended on board acceptance of
any
modification by the Coastal Commission, and prohibiting of any rental
under
the resolution pending such approval.
Subsequently, Brant Stickles, president of the board
of
the Mendocino Art Center and himself a lawyer declared Carter was
blowing
smoke and repeated Carter's arguments but in favor of the art center,
that
it was a person under law and was entitled to due process as provided
in
the bill of rights, and that the transfer of property rights ordained
by
the supervisors on December 15 violated the Brown Act. He and
subsequent
speakers supporting the Art Center noted the institution was
celebrating
its 50th anniversary, and was pumping some $1.5 million annually into
the
countwide economy from direct donations and participant spending. In
addition
it had a vibrantly active 15-member board of directors from a wide
range
of professions and budget for expansion and development.
Former owner of the applicant property Monty Reed
rose
to deliver a personal attack on supervisor Colfax, calling him an
ostrich
with his head in the sand listening only to a vocal minority,
advocating
negative growth and egotistical power plays, finally suggesting he
should
resign.
Another speaker noted the real problem was the
county
was not enforcing against any code violations on the coast, and the
proponent
had been renting these units for years illegally. And he added this was
an
unfair business practice under the California Business Code.
When all was said and done, supervisor Colfax blew a
reading
of the recommended motion and had to be corrected by Nadel. He stated
he was embarrassed by the error and offered the excuse that soon he
would
be in Maui on his vaction. He no longer is capable of serving in office.
This
tourist palace, as well as two other inns are FOR SALE as the client
base shrinks and the credit system is in deep freeze.
Private Property Rules:
In an unusual special session on Monday,
December 15, Mendocino County supervisors approved permits for four
guest rooms for MacCallum Suites in Mendocino at the expense of the Art
Center which has
not yet built the units for which it has been approved.
The long-anticipated vote was 3-2 with supervisors
David Colfax and Kendall Smith dissenting. The action was a last gasp
flouting of
government regulation by private property advocates John Pinches,
Michael Delbar and Jim Wattenburger, the latter two in their last hours
of power.
And it came in the face of repeated warnings by
county counsel Jeanine Nadel who said, "If you do this, you will be
sued." Presumably by the Art Center.
Monty Reed,
the
previous landowner apparently added 4 guest rooms without permits in
violation
of the Town Plan and coastal zoning ordinances placing a cap on visitor
serving
units at the site to keep a balance between commercial, residential,
tourist
and other uses in the zone.
The new owners Jed Ayers and Noah Sheppard hired
Ukiah attorney Carter to work his magic. The elderly mouthpiece for
greedy developers in typical fashion droned on in patrician nasal
tones, waved his arms and gave his histrionic legal opinion alleging
the plain language doesn't really mean what it says and the supes had
the power to permit the illegally added units anyway.
Planning staff had recommended denial because the
Town Plan is under review and an update may be forthcoming and so the
project was
premature.
Senior planner Frank Lynch, county counsel Nadel,
Supervisor Smith and county CEO Tom Mitchell repeatedly pleaded for
patience for another 6-12 months implying the new rooms would be
approved as part of a legal and orderly process when the Town Plan
review and update were done, but not now.
The project has a decades long history and was
instrumental in the formation of a community advisory board at one
point. Proponents repeatedly pointed out the subject Town Plan Table
413.1 had not been updated for fifteen years, in violation of law
claimed Carter.
Said update is now in the purview of the Planning
Team which also has responsibility for the General Plan and the UVAP.
For more information, see
http://www.co.mendocino.ca.us/planningteam/coastal/MTP.htm
The BOS and the Coastal Commission had approved it
ten years ago, but it was tied up in Superior Court for 5 years over a
question of the CC comment period. When it came back before the board
in 2005, it was
denied on a 4-1 vote without prejudice over lack of official data on
the
current mix of visitor serving, residential and commercial uses.
The proponent had gathered voluminous data that
residential had increased and many vacation rentals had gone out of
use, thereby justifying increased tourist units.
Another factor propelling the owners' need to
legalize the extra rooms at this time is that all their properties are
for sale.
These amount to MacCallum House, the Suites, and
Village Inn. The asking price is $10.5 million. Mitchell reported to
the board that all the properties were being advertised with more units
than registered on
county tax rolls. The Mac House seems to have 2 extra rooms, the Suites
these
4, and the Village Inn with one extra room, for a total of 7.
In the hearing, Ayers admitted that the 4
unpermitted suites were regularly rented for overnight, weekend and
extended periods.
This infuriated Colfax who around 5:50 pm launched
into a total denunciation of Ayers' character, stopping just short of
calling him
a lying hypocrite, but specifically accusing the "sanctimonious
innkeeper" of renting out unpermitted units in violation of law,
blaming him for "taking advantage of a county that is uncomfortable"
with prosecuting violations of
its zoning regulations.
"It hurts. It's a kick in the teeth," he declared.
Finally he stated that while he was correctly
rebuked for his earlier show of emotion, "this board should be rebuked
for not taking responsibility" by abating the suites in the past.
When asked by supervisor Smith why unused rooms at
the Art Center should be transferred to him and not someone else, Ayers
replied because he had paid for the extenuated process to obtain
them. When asked why now, Ayers indicated it was so Delbar and
Wattenburger could vote for it.
Supervisor Pinches summed it up by saying
that property rights are rights, not privileges and declaring that the
"public" interest means those who own property. He said the regrets
expressed by staff in not updating the Town Plan earlier was "BS."
The final vote amended the General Plan (still under
"update review") to deny the Art Center the use of four unused rooms
and transfer them to the Suites partners, leaving the total number of
visitor units in the table unchanged.