--
Local Government
Issue
Updates --
AB885 Targets Septic Systems January, 2009
State Water Resources Board staff conducted a
workshop in January in Santa Rosa on AB885 implementation. The 8 year
old law
requires intricate and expensive regulation of septic tanks throughout
California, including residential propertie
Prompted by AB 885 (Jackson), which was signed by
Gov. Gray Davis in 2000, the law requires the regulation of discharges
of waste that impair or threaten to impair surface water or groundwater
quality. The timeline for implementation of those regulations is July
2010.
According to SWRCB staff, septic systems, when
properly installed, remove bacteria and viruses, but may allow soluble
materials resistant to degradation to reach and pollute groundwater and
impair the quality of groundwater and nearby surface water.
The proposed regulations state that persons who
discharge waste must file a report of waste discharge with the regional
water board or have their septic tanks inspected for solids
accumulations every five years by a qualified service provider. The
estimated cost is $325.
Owners whose existing septic systems are within 600
feet of a surface water body that does not meet water quality standards
(impaired water body) will be subject to additional requirements
including possible retrofit of the septic system with supplemental
treatment systems at an estimated cost of $45,000.
All of the requirements for existing septic tanks
will also apply to new septic systems, plus several other requirements,
including a site assessment and design of all new septic systems,
including determinations of seasonal high groundwater.
According to the SWRCB timeline, once the workshops
are completed, staff will analyze responses and make revisions over the
next few months. There will be another 30-day comment period in August,
followed by the adoption of the regulations and waiver. Effective date
of the regulations would be Jan. 1, 2010, followed six months later by
implementation. The six-month delay was stipulated in AB 885.
Further details about the proposed regulations and
maps of impaired water bodies with septic system discharges may be
viewed at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov
CFAR Lawsuit January, 2009
As a result of a law suit filed by Santa Rosa
attorney Rachel Howlett on behalf of Citizens for Adequate Review
(CFAR), CFAR, Mendocino County, and Diversified Developers Realty (DDR)
have reached an agreement which requires environmental review prior to
DDR proceeding further with their proposed Mendocino Crossings
Development on the old Masonite site north of Ukiah.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement between
the parties, the existing slabs, buried footings, underground utilities
and other improvements at the site of the demolished Masonite facility
will remain in place and be included in the scope of environmental
review for the proposed Mendocino Crossings Project. This is an
important victory for local control of our community’s development.
This agreement confirms that, prior to work
beginning, all development proposals must be reviewed, that sites be
safe and clear of toxics prior to any permitted use, and that County
approval must be obtained.
The issue emerged In July of 2007 when the County
issued DDR a permit to demolish the Masonite facility. CFAR asserted
the demolition was the first stage in the development of the site for
commercial purposes, stating this was a piecemeal approach to
development, and a violation of California environmental law.
Validating DDR’s investment in the demolition by issuing the permit was
setting a precedent to keep moving forward with the project.
The County issued the permit with full
knowledge that commercial development in this area was controversial,
including opposition by the City of Ukiah.
Demolition was step one of a multi-staged
project that the County should have known required review under
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA.)
The County Planning and Building Department ignored
the magnitude of the structures on site, the air quality impacts from
demolishing these improvements, the proximity of the demolition to a
school, and also did not send the application to demolish the historic
structures to all relevant County departments and agencies for review
and comment.
Without benefit of a clear and comprehensive review
of its potential deleterious impact to the environment, and the
community, the County abdicated their responsibility to protect the
environment.
There was no recognition by the County that by
issuing the permit they were effectively eliminating existing
manufacturing capacity for future use, and opening the door for DDR to
move ahead with a project in an area not zoned for retail commercial
use.
Conservatives Gripe City Funding of Rec
Center 12/25/08
The Mendocino County Employers Council has stuffed a
letter into the Ukiah Daily Journal bemoaning the December 3 decision
by the city council to fund completion of the Alex Rorabaugh Community
Center for nearly a half million dollars.
The funds would come from the City-County
Redevelopment Authority. Originally, the proposal was that the Ukiah
Unified School District, Mendocino College and the County would partner
with the City to raise just under $1.5 million to pay off debts and
complete construction. Under the contract, city recreation programs
manager Sage Sangiacomo and his staff will manage the rec center once
the gym is complete.
Until now the partially completed center 21,000
square foot center has been
managed by former supervisor and city councilman Richard Shoemaker who
deferred operational decisions to the teens at the Boys and Girls Club
which has gone in and out of existence since the center opened several
years ago.
While the city has plunged ahead with its share of
the obligation, the other agencies have balked.
The MCEC letter is signed by Margie Handley of
Willis, owner of Hot Rocks construction company and partner in the
Harris Quarry. She is a former Republican candidate for state assembly,
a former CalTrans commissioner and the daughter of the late Robert
Harrah, founder of Retech. It complains that the redevelopment
funds should go toward infrastructure that benefits businesses, not
"social projects."
The recreation center, only partially constructed,
is part of the Grace Hudson School complex built on the site of the
former Bi-Lo Market and Montgomery Wards. It is located just south of
the Ukiah city limit in a low income, high crime, largely Hispanic
neighborhood. City police chief Chris Dewey says the center will
help to pacify the barrio.
Handley's letter complains because the center is
located outside the city, and is operated as a non-profit, that it will
not generate city tax revenues.
She also points out the city's budget per citizen is
twice that of the county, and that the entity has major construction
problems in its sewer and water plants, as well as a $5 million bond
payment on the new sewer plant coming due.
"As the business base vacates Ukiah, how can the
City of Ukiah survive?" she asks. "How can we stop the City Council,
the City Manager and the City staff from growing their personal
empire's (sic) with public funds!" she asks.
Outgone second district supervisor Jim Wattenburger
told the press he was shocked the city would come back and ask the
county for more rec center funding. He said the county and city had
just adopted a five year plan for the RDA, and had removed language
supporting the Rorabaugh Center.
Incoming supervisor John McCowen said that decision
could be reversed by the new board.
Gonzalez is Building
and Planning Director. 12/12/08
In early December, 2008, county CEO Tom Mitchell
picked
Nash Gonzalez as the County's new Director of Planning and Building..
Ignacio (Nash) Gonzalez was born and raised in
Willits. and has been a land use and planner for 23 years in Mendocino
County and beyond.. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Planning from
Sonoma State University and is also a certified planner by the American
Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). Nash previously worked for the
Mendocino County Department of Planning and Building Services between
1986 and 1999 as a planner.
To further his career, in 1999 he went on to the
City of Healdsburg to assist the City in it’s development application
review
efforts until 2001, when he went on to work with PMC, a municipal
contract
planning firm that works with hundreds of public agencies throughout
the
western United States.
During his tenure with PMC, Nash had the opportunity
to work in a variety of communities throughout California managing both
staff and a variety of projects from residential, commercial to
industrial developments, as well as environmental reviews and long
range planning efforts. The communities in which Nash has worked
include: the Cities of Cotati, Corte Madera, Walnut Creek,
Hillsborough, Willows, Clearlake, Fort Bragg, Willits, Grass Valley,
Lompoc, Santa Barbara; and the Counties of Amador, Butte, Orange,
Solano, Sonoma, Kern, Siskiyou and Santa Clara.
For the last two years, Nash has been the county's
contract planner for the Harris Quarry expansion.
. He has also worked as an adjunct
instructor at Mendocino College, where he has taught Real Estate
courses since 1989. Most recently he was instrumental in
re-establishing the Real Estate Degree program at Mendocino College.
He replaces Ray Hall who was building and planning
director for 25 years.
The department confronts significant challenges in
the completion of the UVAP, the General Plan, the Harris Quarry, the
DDR project at the former Masonite Site, and the renewed threat of
offshore oil development.
In selecting Gonzalez, Mitchell overlooked interim
director Frank Lynch, another seasoned veteran of the department. This
is expected to cause friction within the staff as it attempts to
wrestle with the ongoing work load in a time of shrinking budgets.
General Plan Update: 5/12/09
More vitally important than DDR or marijuana
legislation is the county General Plan EIR hearing on Monday, May 18 at
the Low Gap Funny Farm. At that time and place, the Board of
Supervisors is expected to certify the Final Environmental Impact
Report and approve the Mendocino County General Plan Update.
You should plan to attend that all day meeting. At
stake is the future of land use here for the next 20 years.
The legally mandated and much delayed Update
of its General Plan (GPU) is intended as a basic permit for all
development and planning for 28 million acres of the county except the
incorporated cities of Ukiah, Willits and Fort Bragg until 2028. It
incorporates the Local Coastal Plan and the Ukiah Valley Area Plan.
Also excepted will be the former Masonite site owned by Developers
Diversified Realty as its General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan
initiative is expected to easily pass. It also lacks a Housing Element
which is on a legally mandated separate track.
Such plans are subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act and thus must have an Environmental Impact
Report. The Plan EIR is a program EIR which allows expedited or
limited review of individual projects subject to it.
While it is grossly inadequate, and a number of
organizations and individuals have called for it to be scrapped and a
new process begun using local citizen advisory committees instead of
outside planners, that's not likely to happen according to sources on
the board who say the press of other business and general lack of funds
makes that route unthinkable for the BOS at this
time.
The County of Mendocino supervisors and the planning
commission held a workshop on the Final General Plan Update and its EIR
on March 1. The Planning Commission held its own hearings on the
Final General Plan Update on April 2 and April 16 taking public
comment. That was also the occasion for a presentation spearheaded by
former supervisor Norman deVall asking for medical marijuana production
zones. The chances of that happening approach zero, as the most liberal
member of the commission privately told this author she thought medical
marijuana was a hoax and her neighbor is endangering her by attracting
thieves.
The deadline for public comments on the final EIR is
the day of the final hearing, and they should be delivered in person
there, or by writing to the Mendocino County Planning and Building
Department, 501 Low Gap Road, Ukiah California, 95482.
The GPU and its EIR can be accessed at
http://www.co.mendocino.ca.us/planningteam/gpu/mtg_fGPU.htm
For more information, call 463-4281.
The County planning team received over 120 responses
to the Draft General Plan Update after public comment closed on
November 18. The voluminous number of comments from public agencies,
private entities and citizens indicates the many reasons the plan is
inadequate and should be rejected. It is available as a 750 page pfd as
a public service on our website www.mendocinocountry.com on the Voters
Union family of pages. You are urged to skim through it to help develop
your own thoughts and see the breathtaking range and technical depth of
the opposition.
This is the first modification of the
County's General Plan since 1981. The so-called Update has a different
structure than the original plan it modifies, reorganizing some 10
elements into four general categories: planning principles,
development, resources, housing and community specific policies for
Mendocino Town, Brooktrails, and the UVAP. This was at the convenience
of PMC consultants of Davis, CA but obscures the route by which changes
were made and makes review difficult.
Along with the Update, some 33 specific projects received
early and expedited approval under the previous board. They were vetted
by the Planning Team instead of planning and building staff and
individually greenlighted by the BOS.
Certification of the final EIR initiates a one
year period during which the County can be sued to vacate the Plan, but
any such action must be preceded by a Notice 60 days in advance. And
the suit can only claim causes that were raised at or before the public
hearing, including the comments on the Draft..
The Draft Ukiah Valley Area Plan will come under
consideration after the General Plan process is complete.
The present GP was written in 1981 after a
lawsuit successfully challenged the 1970's collection of County
planning polices as inadequate. It reflects the frontier assumptions of
40 years ago when nature was something to dominate and convert to
economic uses with little or no concern for consequences.
Harris Quarry Asphalt Proposal
Updated 3/6/09
In January, Jack Magne of Keep the Code
published an op ed in the Willits News with an aerial photograph of the
Harris Quarry. The piece referred to an engineering report showing that
Northen Aggregates, the owner operator, had removed substantially more
material from the site than permitted or reported. Last year, the
county planning department cited NAI for exceeding its extraction
permit and NAI agreed to pay the county an
undisclosed settlement.
In early February, the company responded by hiring
former supervisor Hal Wagenet as its public spokesperson and
governmental representative charged with "sheparding" the quarry
expansion and batch plant project through the county approval process.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was to be approved last year
so former supervisor Wattenburger could supply the swing vote,
but it has since been withdrawn with no known re-emergence date.
In a Willits News interview, Wagenet claimed the
company, the product and the project was "environmentally superior" and
cited his membership
in Willits Economic Locallzation as his environmental credentials.
MENDOCINO
COUNTRY has asked WELL to respond.
Late last yearr, BOS
certification of EIR on the 100-year permit for the Harris Quarry
expansion and batch
asphalt plant on the Ridgewood Grade between Ukiah and Willits next to
Highway
101 was withdrawn by applicant Northern Aggregates pending
mofication.
As it stands, the current EIR is woefully
inadequate, containing substantially no believable data on cumulative
impacts, for example.
In 2006, the applicant wanted to permit a processing
plant for stone and concrete, but found that county zoning didn't allow
it. So on the way to blasting throught to approval of its own project,
it proposed the rezoning of all the county's quarries to permit
industrial facilities as well.
Organized community opposition resulted in
supervisors requiring an EIR on both the proposed Mineral Processing
Combining District and their specific project at Harris Quarry.
The quarry's current operations are taking place
under a permit that expired nearly 2 years ago. In addition, the
company is extracting material in excess of the permitted rate of
75,000 cubic yards per year.
The county issued a notice of violation in July of 2008, but
extraction continues apace.
A local group of concerned citizens == Keep The Code
-- hired a professional engineer, Richard B. Davis, a specialist in
aerial photography surveying, to fly over Harris Quarry to determine
volume of rock extraction over the previous fourteen years. The yearly
average, over and above county permit limits was a troubling 45 million
pounds.
The survey was performed with a Cessna 310 mapping
plane which is equipped with a GPS controlled Wild-Leica cartographic
camera.
Comparison with the earlier base topographical mapping data resulted in
extraction estimate with a plus/minus 4 % accuracy. Use of "short
tons",
(2000 lbs.), instead of long tons, made the estimate very conservative.
By itself, over extraction results in excessive and
non-permitted truck trips at the dangerous intersection of the quarry
entrance and Hwy 101 at the top of the Ridgewood Grade.
Serious accidents involving these trucks are a significant
concern. Furthermore, the over extraction of rock creates
non-permitted and excessive dust (particulate), noise and degradation
of water quality in the headwaters of a major tributary of the Russian
River.
Northern Aggregates provides unverified reports on
its annual extraction to the county planning and building department on
the "honor system," but the county is forbidded by state law from
making
the information public for "proprietary" reasons.
Keep the Code is publicizing the photo in order to
galvanize public opposition to the project and is soliciting funds to
reimburse
volunteer members for the survey which reportedly cost thousands of
dollars.
Impacts:
Asphalt plants are sources of air pollution that may
emit significant levels of both particulate matter and gaseous volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) considered to be dangerous to human health,
including hydrogen sulfide, benzene, chromium, formaldehyde, and
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Charles Martin of Keep The Code stated recently: "
The asphalt plant alone would disperse more than 30,000 pounds of
yearly
volatile organic compounds (VOC), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAH),
both toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic (birth defects)-substances that
will
condense in the cooler atmosphere and precipitate downward over the
headwaters
of both river systems." The Harris Quarry is located near the watershed
boundary
of two major North Coast river systems- the Russian River and the Eel
River.
Ground water pollution would flow down from this ridgetop location into
both drainages with negative impacts on wildlife and fish.
The 300-ton/hour hot mix asphalt plant project as it
stands now would produce also produce air emissions impacting
agricultural, residential and school property.
Simultaneous with the release of the photograph,
County public health physician Dr. Marvin Trotter commented: “I am
concerned with the level of pollutants associated with this project,
and strongly believe further study of this matter is essential”
Round the clock operations would create noise,
visual impacts in a highly scenic area and light pollution at night.
The project would obtain and use up vast quantities
of spring water from the site. In addition, there would be increased
risk of traffic accidents and fire from petroleum fuel trucks feeding
the plant.
Expedite
Cancelled:
On October 21, the BOS unanimously granted Leonard
Charles, its consultant on the project an additional $57,000 for
changes
to its contract in order to include the following. The expedite was
subsequently
retracted as a a result of citizen outcry over providing an opportunity
for lame duck supervisor Wattenburger to form a third vote for
approval.
The accelerated schedule would have required the consultants to work
through
Thanksgiving weekend. Despite the withdrawal, the funds were spent.
• The applicant was proposing to construct
replacement channels for wetlands on the site. The effects of
constructing these wetlands and their value as mitigation for wetland
loss must be reviewed.
• The applicant proposed additional improvements to
Highway 101 which will have different impacts on highway operations and
will require additional roadway widening
• The applicant prepared a revised traffic report
that includes a different number of trips than the applicant originally
provided. This changes the traffic impacts,
• The applicant provided a new, and different, list
of heavy equipment and generators that will be used on the site. This
required a reassessment of air quality impacts. Because the number of
truck trips
has increased, the air quality analysis of emissions from trucks must
be
modified.
• The applicant provided additional data about site
drainage and the design and operation of the bioretention swale.
New Board:
Approval of both the renewal of the existing quarry
expansion and the processing zone overlay was pretty much a done deal
under the 2007-8 BOS for whom private property rights were absolute.
The new board also believes in Ownership Uber Alles,
but with better review. Second district supervisor McCowen has stated
he believes
the zoning revision should be separated from the quarry permit renewal.
Keep the Code is the local citizen watchdog group
that lobbied for the EIR and opposes the expansion and MPCD. The
steering committee of KTC is Charles Martin, Jay and Lael Fraser, Roni
McFadden, Dori Cramer and Sheila Jenkins.
They urge all county residents contact their own
supervisor with concerns over this project which in the wake of the
closures of Masonite and Georgia Pacific will become the single most
significant pollution point source in the county.
They are appealing for funds to pay legal and
organizing costs. Donations may be sent to KTC, Keep The
Code, P.O.Box
598, Ukiah.Checks should be made out the the WILLITS ENVIRONMENTAL
CENTER
with Keep the Code in the memo line. Once the EIR is
certified, the group will have only 30 days to sue.. For more
information,
contact Charles Martin at 459-9005 or email bioorganic2@yahoo.com
Former Masonite Site (Updated 3/8/09)
Constant delay in preparing planning documents is
the time honored tradition in Mendocino County. And that tradition
is alive and well today, much to the dismay of out of county developers
who have bet a pile of dough buying a closed down particle board plant
in the northern Ukiah Valley.
While Developer's Diversified Realty of Ohio
and Los Angeles waits for its expected zoning change so it can start
renting out space in its imaginary Mega Mall at Masonite (See
Independent #51, April 2008), the mechanisms of county government that
are designed to bequeath those boons on private developers seems to be
falling apart at the seams.
The zoning change to permit retail operations
on the paved over brownfield north of Ukiah cannot be had before the
approval of the Ukiah Valley Area Plan by the Board of Supervisors. And
the approval cannot happen until General Plan Update Environmental
Impact Report is
certified, and
the EIR cannot be certified until approved by the planning commission,
and none of that can happen until the Draft Environmental Impact Report
has been vetted through public hearings.
Last summer, newly minted county executive
officer Tom
Mitchell announced to the board that the General Plan would not be
finished
until May of 2009, and the UVAP
part will not be ready until October .
Thus, former supervisor Wattenburger was
frustrated in his lifetime political dream of casting the swing vote to
approve the DDR project zoning change. Bitterly despondent, the active
duty CDF fire captain and stalwart defender of private
property rights opted not to run for re-election at the last moment in
March, allowing Ukiah City Councilman John McCowen to
capture control of the race to succeed him in office.
Water availability for at the Masonite
Brownfield is problematic, as the state Water Resources Board has held
that there is no percolated groundwater in California and all water is
underflow of various stream tributaries. In addition, no one has used
or reported on water use from the former Masonite well for over five
years. Consequently the state has no obligation to recognize any use of
that water.
DDR claims in its marketing propaganda that
it owns water rights at the site.
Meanwhile, the staff structure undergirding
the Developer Support Machinery of Mendocino County is coming apart,
as planning team director Phil Gourney was phased out and long
time
planning department director Ray Hall etired.
The UVAP draft EIR is currently under
internal review by the Mendocino County planning department. On August
21,
of 2007 the BOS chose a preferred alternative of maximum buildout,
greatly
pleasing DDR who took that as a sign their project would be fast
tracked.
The Planning Team is creating study
document on three alternative projections: the DDR friendly preferred
alternative chosen by the board in 2007, an alternative "mixed use"
study, and the Smart Growth approved so called Alternative B which
envisions
keeping the site zoned industrial.
Medical Marijuana Zoning
112826
In November of 2008, former 5th District
Mendocino County Supervisor
(1979-1995) Norman de Vall has submitted comments to the General Plan
Update urging the Supervisors to include medical cannabis regulation. "
He was retained by the Mendocino Medical Marijuana
Advisory Board (MMMAB).
MMMAB urged Supervisors to pass "reasonable
Land Use regulations" to enhance patient access to medical marijuana as
well as to benefit the County financially.
Normalizing legitimate growing of medical marijuana
for the benefit not only of patient-growers, collectives and
cooperatives, but for the County as well, is overdue and it is time for
the Board of Supervisors to begin to substantially engage in the
process they said in a prepared statement. They said there is a window
of opportunity to do so through in the General Plan Update process.
The question is: Where and How can legitimate
growers of medical marijuana be enabled to serve patient-growers,
collectives and cooperatives, as well as the County?
The answer put forward by de Vall & Associates
and the MMMAB is through specific land use designations, either as a
Use by Right (i.e., Ministerial with no permit required) or through a
Minor or Major Use Permit for "collective cooperative cultivation
projects" (SB 420) or by any other appropriate land use designation
that fulfills the regulation purpose of the legislation.
In de Vall's letter to the supervisors, he based his
recommendation for the regulated, controlled and publicly beneficial
production
of Medical Marijuana California Health and Safety Codes 11362.5 et seq,
(the
Medical Marijuana Program).
He said the General Plan Update was an
opportunity to designate the land use types on which medical marijuana
can be produced and what conditions its production must meet.
Nuisance Liens 12/25/08
The county Building Department has released a list of 59 nuisance violations to
MENDOCINO
COUNTRY pursuant to the state Public Records Act and the Freedom of
Information
Act. We wanted to know if the nuisance laws were being abused to target
back
to the land owner builders or marijuana gardens in violation of the mmj
nuisance
ordinance limit of 25 plants.
In releasing the list, code compliance officer Jim
McCleary
wrote that enforcement of that ordinance was responsibility of the
Sheriff's
office.
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
recently
amended Chapter 8.75 of the Mendocino County Code establishing the
Mendocino
County Uniform Nuisance Abatement Procedure. Adopted by the Board to
encourage
compliance with nuisance abatement orders from various departments
charged
with preserving community health and safety, Ordinance No. 4183
provides
for the assessment of civil penalties for failure to abate public
nuisances,
leading ultimately to recordation of tax liens against the title to
property
for those who fail to abate public nuisances.
On October 21, Mr. Frank Lynch, Interim Director,
Planning and Building Services, and Mr. Jim McCleary, Code Enforcement
Officer, provided background information regarding revisions to
Mendocino County Code Chapter 8.75 establishing the Mendocino County
Uniform Nuisance Abatement Procedure.
The violation and abatement process involves a
flow chart tracking mechanism review to cases every 90 days, The same
cases
will come before the Board over and over again every 90 days with
increasing
penalties until the fees and taxes are paid or the property defaulted
and
sold at auction.
The new County ordinance 8.75 provides for fines of
up to $100 per day up to 90 days for first offense, added to up to $200
per day
for 90 days, added to $500 per day for the third offense and running.
This is all at the sole and exclusive discretion of
the code enforcement officer whom you cannot bar from entering your
property. There is an appeal process, but only to andministrative
judges hired by the building department. The fines are recorded
as a tax lien upon action of the Board of Supervirors.
The state revenue and taxation code says that
if your property taxes are not paid in 5 years from when due, the
property can default to the county and sold at auction However yu
can pay your fine directly to the Enforcement Officer who is the only
person authorized to spend
the money -- on enforcement activities.
The backlog of cases is substantial as it has been
in progress for over 10 years (the County process did not previously
have sanctions in place to effectively abate violations).
Mcleary claimed that approximately 68 nuisance
abatement orders are out right now, and staff are receiving
approximately
40 cases per month, and issuing notices accordingly;
However, the list he provided the Independent contains
only
51 cases and many of them are closed. Of the open cases five years or
older,
there are only five. The case number includes the year opened.
- ZC-2003-0019, a junkyard in Fort Bragg
- BI-1985-0994, a remodel with numerous building code
violations,
and travel trailers. Burk Hill Road south of Ukiah
- ZC-2002-0015, buried refuse and slash from tree removal,
Little
River.
- ZI-1991-0068, a junkyard, abandoned vehicles in Little
River.
- ZI-2002-0011, a campground and travel trailers in Potter
Valley
McCleary said he
would
approach the Board with requests for liens; and will return before the
Board
every 90 days. This process will, as it develops, begin to take a
substantial
amount of the Board’s time.
.