The MENDOCINO COUNTRY Independent
Web Posted My 20, 2009


For Documentary Resources on this issue, go to our Voters Union page.

nbmnbnmDDR MEGA MALL INITIATIVE ON FAST TRACK
    A corporate backed voter initiative to rezone the former Masonite Property north of Ukiah and approve a Specific Plan for a shopping center mixed use complex is about to qualify for the ballot, probably in November.
    If it passes, the ability of local governments to enforce land use policies and provide a coordinated vision for our future will be irrevocably impaired. In other communities, socalled "ballot box zoning" has snowballed, pushing elected officals to the margins of the land use decision making process.
    This is an issue of major countywide significance, and voters in all districts are urged to organize to defeat it.

Rapid Deployment
    Only last March did Developers Diversified Realty of Beachwood, Ohio announced it would ask county voters to pass an initiative to amend the County General Plan, rezoning DDR’s 76-acre Masonite site north of Ukiah from industrial to mixed use and adopt a Specific Plan written for DDR by an Orange County consultant -- 310 pages long.  
    It allows DDR to build “Mendocino Crossings” shopping center with any combination it wants of big box retail stores, residences and other facilities, with the mix to be based on “market demand.”  There are 3.3 million square feet on the site, and a single big box store could be up to 800,000 square feet. The parking lot would hold more than 3,000 cars.  The Specific Plan would also allow DDR to build up to 150 residences. Signs over the site could be up to 100 feet  high.
    They recruited a group of local citizens calling itself Mendocino County Tomorrow which  filed an intent to circulate the measure. These are small businesspeople who were probably  identified in the polling the company did last  year. They are ideologically libertarian -- critics of government regulation as such -- and they are probably being groomed as future candidates for office. Finally emerging from the shadows at a recent BOS meeting, some of them proved more articulate than others.
    After the county counsel approved a ballot title and summary on April 1, some two dozen hired petitioners hit the streets countwide. They appeared to be low income males from Southern California with a particular approach to voters which depended on a mixture of flattery, deception and intimidation.
    In Laytonville, a petitioner was criticized and sued after allegedly knocking a customer at the local grocery to the ground. To be sure he was defending himself from illegally being forced to leave the premises.
    The political consultant firm which hired the firm that hired the petitioners has a history of conflict and controversy in its operations, as well as a tremendous record of success.
    Despite our reputation for independence, those tactics worked well here also, and just 30 days later, the company's captive organization turned in 10,700 signatures. They only needed 7,000 to qualify for a special election.
    On May 12, the BOS voted 3-2 against a detailed motion by supervisor McCowen to direct staff to produce a study of the project's impacts on a range of parameters including tax revenue, the local economy, land and housing, traffic and water. Only supervisor Brown supported it.
    On May 18, however, the board voted 4-1 with Pinches dissenting to direct the CEO to present a study June 16 based on a memo from the planning department. At that time, the board will likely order the initiative to be placed on the November ballot.

Who's Behind It?
     The FPPC form 410 for Mendocino County Tomorrow Candidate PAC reveals that the treasurer is Ken Marshall of 381 Lovers Lane in Ukiah, but the assistant treasurer is Chistopher Skinnell of 2350 Kerner Boulevard, Suite 250 in San Rafael.
    DDR has formed a second committee which will actually make the decisions, conduct the campaign and spend the money. This is called "Citizens to bring Jobs, Tax Dollars, and Local Shopping to Mendocino County -- a Coalition being Led by Mendocino County Tomorrow with Major Funding by DDR DB Mendocino LP."
    DDR DB Mendocino LP was filed in Delaware in February of 2007 with headquarters at the Developers Diversified Realty building in Beachwood Ohio. The street address is listed at 456 B North State Street in Ukiah, in the Montanos office building south of The Coffee Critic. The mailing address however is the San Rafael office of Mr. Skinnell.
    The Treasurer of the "Citizens to bring etc," is Stan Hoffman at 455 East 500 South, Suite 300 in Salt Lake City. The assistant treasurer is Jason D. Kaune at the San Rafael office of Mr. Skinnell, who is also listed as another assistant treasurer. And additional officers are listed as Joan Allgood and David Weiss at the Beachwood, Ohio address of Developers Diversified Realty. According to campaign finance statements filed with the county clerk, this committee has received $170,000 from DDR.

Help Defeat DDR:
    On May 1, Cliff Paulin announced the formation of a campaign committee to oppose the DDR Initiative, with additional spokespeople Ukiah mayor Mari Rodin and Potter Valley farmer Guiness McFadden as additional spokespeople.
    Paulin said that the campaign to stop DDR would focus on the need to keep the Masonite site available for new industrial jobs, rather than the low-wage chain store jobs that DDR's mall would provide. "Studies show that every new job in a big shopping mall causes the loss of 1.4 jobs in local stores that lose business," he explained.
    "Voters will think twice when they learn about how DDR is exempting itself from any environmental review under state law," said Paulin. "There will be no environmental impact report that will verify that North State Street can handle the traffic or that the Russian River can supply the water."
    For more information, email sole@pacific.net and see www.nomegamall.com Donations can be sent to Save Our Local Economy, Post Office Box 1530, Ukiah, CA 95482.

The Impacts:
    The major economic impacts are the potential for vacancies and blight in downtown Ukiah, Willits and , along with the long term loss of industrially zoned land in the county.
    Such a permanent rezoning of the site to mixed use is a community choice to embrace low wage employment. The site is currentlly zoned for industry and was used by Masonite Corporation for 50 years.  DDR bought the site in 2005 and demolished the plant facilities, despite appeals to save it for new industrial uses.  
    The 76-acre property is the largest industrial parcel in the inland county and has rail access and other features that make it ideal for new industrial development.  
    A new 30-acre industrial park north of the site shows a demand for facilities suited to light industry, automotive repair and aftermarket conversion, owner operated machine shops and cottage industries of all kinds.  Industrial employers offer better wages, training and benefits than retail stores.  Many timber industry officials believe that the regrowth of the county’s forests will create a need for new wood products in the future.
    Also, industry creates a stronger local economy because it brings money into the area, instead of draining it out like big box stores do.  There is good potential for future industrial use of the Masonite site, if it stays in industrial zoning.  
    The fiscal impacts are enormous as the project as designed would create an alternative city on the northern border of Ukiah generating sales taxes to the county, but not the city.
    The major environmental impacts are traffic and water.
    The County’s draft General Plan for the Ukiah Valley found that major traffic improvements would be needed if there is to be more development around the Masonite site, including a new north-south road and a new freeway access off Brush Street.
     But DDR doesn’t want to pay for those improvements, so the Specific Plan dictates that North State Street will bear all the burden.  DDR’s Plan specifies 5 new traffic lights on North State Street, bringing the total to 7 traffic lights in the 1⁄2 mile stretch from Orr Springs Road to Ford Road.
    Millview Water District plans a major upgrade to its pipes under North State Street, unrelated to the DDR project, most of which is not included in Millview's jurisdiction.
    Millview has a moratorium on new hookups, and requires any new use identify a new source of water. The Specific Plan names Masonite Well Six as the new source, which is located between the DDR site and the Russian River, land still owned by Masonite and zoned agricultural. The well has not been used for at least 10 years and may be degraded. Millview's district director has said their is no agreement to hook up Mendocino Crossings in the near future. If the Masonite Corporation deeds the well to Millview, that and the annexation of the shopping center site would have to be approved by LAFCO, and may thus require an EIR. If voters approve the initiative, there may not be sufficent water to service the project.

Regulatory Considerations
    This site was crucial to the most significant change in local politics last year, the unseating of libertarian, pro development, anti-environmental supervisors Wattenburger and Delbar.
    In August of 2007, Wattenburger was the key vote in approving maximum buildout parameters in the Ukiah Valley Area Plan program EIR. That decision would allow up to 1.3 million square feet of retail and 871 housing units. (see Voters Union page, www.mendocinocountry.com
    Unlike the UVAP, however, the DDR initiative itself has no mechanism for CEQA review, and courts have found voter measures to be exempt. That means that if it passes, the Specific Plan cannot be modified or mitigated except by another vote of the people. It contains finding declaring that it is consistent with the Ukiah Valley Area Plan and the current and future General Plans, but it is not.

Impacts on Land Use Planning and Politics
    Observers of ballot-box zoning in California note that initiatives beget more voter initatives. That is, once the concept of making land-use decisions gets embedded in the local political culture, it replicates itself, burrowing deeper and deeper into the political landscape. That entrenchment is partly because some ballot-box zoning actually requires voter approval for subsequent amendments, and it's also because, over time, people come to expect that they -- and not their elected officials -- are the ones who set land use policy.
    The 2008 Save Our Anaheim Resort District, also known as the Disney Ballot Box Zoning Initiative, would have removed authority from the Anaheim, California City Council to make any land-use decision within 2.5 miles of the Disneyland resort area without prior voter approval. The initiative was paired with a referendum  seeking to overturn an early 2007 decision by the council to give residential zoning on 1,500 acres in the prime resort area of Anaheim to SunCal, a real estate development company. That residential zoning would have enabled SunCal to build 1,500 condo units in or near the prime resort area.
    With the support of Anaheim Mayor Curt Pringle and State Senator Lou Correa, the SOAR Coalition and more than 100 volunteers collected 21,243 signatures in less than 30 days.     The Walt Disney company, as of October 31, 2007, had spent $1.7 million on the SOAR campaign, with $402,000 going directly to SOAR. SOAR has received only one other donation, which consisted of $100.
    The funding enabled collection of signatures on both the veto referendum seeking to overturn the city council's grant of residential zoning to SunCal, and on the initiative seeking in the future to prevent the city council from making such zoning changes without direct, citywide, voter approval.
    The National Petition Management company coordinated the signature collection effort.
`Opposition to the Disney Ballot Box Zoning Initiative came from the Committee to Defend and Protect Anaheim which is funded by members of the Anaheim city council and SunCal, the real estate development firm whose planned development is the source of the controversy.
    The Committee to Defend and Protect Anaheim issued withdrawal cards so that citizens could remove their signatures from SOAR's referendum and initiative, asking them to "Stop the Disney Takeover."[5]
`There were police reports of the groups harassing each other. One was when SunCal petitioners were in the way of the Disney petition table at a local farmer's market. Todd Ament, co-chairman of SOAR, also reported the SunCal petitioners blocking him again when he tried to set up a table.
    SunCal has reported similar actions from SOAR. John Lewis, a SunCal political consultant, said opponents show up where petitioners were already stationed. "SOAR people got in their face and tried to intimidate them."
    The issue has spawned three lawsuits, three ballot measures, a threat of a recall and protests at City Hall.